Answer by jwthoughts
They didn’t unless it was in the last 4 years as my great grandson was born in Hawaii 4 years ago and my granddaughter received a long form birth certificate.
PennyLee…It was not the souvenir. It was the official document with the state seal and no, it did not have the foot prints. Since the whole Obama debacle, I have looked at it, contacted officials in Hawaii, and confirmed what it is and its authenticity.
I find it ironic that the also “confirmed” that the BC that Obama had posted on line was supposedly all that they did at the time, but today they released the “long form” that according to them about a year ago, did not exist…that they did not have two different forms.
Sorry, but the state of Hawaii lied for Obama, and now it is escalating and their lies are being exposed.
 | US $2.35 End Date: Tuesday May-22-2012 7:55:21 PDT Buy It Now for only: US $2.35 Buy it now | Add to watch list |
 | US $59.99 End Date: Tuesday May-22-2012 7:56:04 PDT Buy It Now for only: US $59.99 Buy it now | Add to watch list |
Related posts:
- Q&A: What year did Hawaii stop using the long form birth certificate as the official certificate?
- 2011 Educational Travel Book of the Year Awarded to Natural Hawai?i: An Inquisitive Kid?s Guide
- !?hawaii?!?
- 2030 Clean Energy Rebate Program First of its Kind in Hawaii
- Can you help me convince my husband that Hawaii is the place to go for our anniversary?
According to Hawaii officials, they stopped generating paper documents when they computerized the Vital Records in 2001.
@JW: are you sure the birth certificate they got wasn’t the hospital souvenir? If it had baby footprints, it isn’t the state-issued one.